When the Charter Falls Short, Character Has to Lead
As patience runs thin, Grand Prairie’s city council face a defining vote that will reveal whether principle still guides City Hall.
Founding documents like charters and bylaws are created to uphold fairness, structure, and trust in governance. They are written under the assumption that those in power will act in good faith for the public good. But what happens when that assumption collapses — when leaders either exploit the rules or simply refuse to be bound by their spirit?
Grand Prairie has faced that question twice in just twelve months. Two high-profile cases — former GPISD Superintendent Jorge Arredando and sitting city councilman Mike Del Bosque — have revealed how easily bad faith actors can undermine public trust, leaving ethical officials and frustrated taxpayers caught in the middle.
In the case of former GPISD Superintendent Jorge Arredando, legal maneuvering became a shield against accountability. He used the courts to secure an injunction that tied the hands of the board overseeing him, effectively halting any action they could take. Even as public outrage justifiably mounted, the process was stalled — not by lack of evidence or will, but by a legal tactic that prioritized technicalities over trust, and forced taxpayers to watch their own money essentially be swindled from them without any justice, even to this day.
Meanwhile, sitting city councilman Mike Del Bosque revealed a different flaw: the limits of the city charter itself. Unlike Arredando’s use of the courts, Del Bosque hasn’t manipulated the system — he simply doesn’t care about the rules unless they benefit him or can be twisted to suit his own agenda. Despite widespread calls for resignation, he continues serving, leaving the council to address a councilman who lacks the basic moral integrity that most in the city expect from anyone in public office, constrained by rules that were never built to confront such deliberate defiance. His lawyer even reached out to CBS News and doubled down, calling Del Bosque’s actions “self defense.” This isn’t a man who thinks he’s done anything wrong in the first place.
The deeper problem isn’t just the misconduct of Arredando or Del Bosque — it’s the weak governing bodies surrounding them. City charters and bylaws assume that officials will hold each other accountable, but that only works if the governing body has the will to act. When councils are divided, hesitant, or unwilling to take even basic public stands, bad actors face little resistance.
A major factor in that hesitation is fear — not just political fear, but fear of legal backlash in an increasingly litigious culture. Elected officials know that every action could trigger lawsuits, injunctions, or personal liability claims, creating an environment where doing nothing often feels safer than doing what’s right. This dynamic creates a dangerous feedback loop. Misconduct goes unchecked because enforcement mechanisms are weak and members fear legal retaliation. Public trust erodes as citizens see accountability stall. And future bad actors are emboldened, realizing the system can be exploited if they’re willing to cross lines others won’t — and when people ask, “How did that person end up on _______ board?” this is how.
The next test of the council’s resolve comes on August 5, when members are scheduled to vote on whether to censure Del Bosque for his actions. For the average Grand Prairian who has seen the footage, the expectation seems obvious: censure should be unanimous. The behavior was appalling; anyone with humility would have resigned in disgrace. Yet Del Bosque has shown no remorse and has even framed himself as the hero in exchanges shared on social media.
Even if passed, the censure will be largely symbolic — not only because the charter provides no direct mechanism to remove him, but because it will reflect the mindset of the people who serve alongside him. Of the eight council members, only four have made any public statement about the incident, leaving the other four largely silent. Shockingly, when CBS News interviewed residents after watching the video, they reached out for comment for all 9 members of the council - not one of them responded. Are they prepared to do something hard and take a stand for accountability, or will fear — of political consequences, or of legal entanglements in a lawsuit-happy climate — dictate their response?
In both the Arredando and Del Bosque cases, one truth stands out: tax-paying, rule-following citizens are ignored, with the hope that the weak will be forgiven over time and that things will just blow over. Leaders are calculating a risk based on the good graces and mercy of the public, who to this point have often been willing to move past things. But patience appears to be running thin with many Grand Prairians — even among the most avid supporters.
Under Texas law, city charters like Grand Prairie’s can be amended with voter approval. But change requires council action or a petition from at least 5% of voters — a process designed for normal times, not emergencies created by bad actors. This means that when misconduct happens, the mechanisms to fix it lag far behind the harm being done. While reform is possible, it’s neither swift nor simple — and in the meantime, public frustration only grows.
The crises sparked by Arredando and Del Bosque are more than isolated scandals; they are warnings about systemic vulnerabilities. Changing rules or updating the charter won’t fix the deeper problem: a governing culture that hesitates to confront wrongdoing. Until elected officials are willing to act decisively — to put principle over politics, and accountability over fear — no policy change will matter. What Grand Prairie needs most is not new processes, but leaders with the courage to enforce the standards already in place.
Grand Prairie now faces a choice: continue relying on a charter built on assumptions of good faith, or confront the deeper issue — whether the people entrusted with authority are willing to use it. Even the strongest laws are meaningless if those in power refuse to act. And this time, it’s unclear if public patience will hold.
Support the mission of the Faces of Grand Prairie Media Group by making a financial donation here..